Help please
it says nothing about whether a or b have to be positive/negative/integers/whatever you only know that b is an exponent and that means b is the number that says how many times to multiply a by itself so A+D
|dw:1517462564775:dw|
just start off with the a terms use rule 1 + 2 to simplify (a^2 * a^3)/(a^5)
gonna go to sleep tag me again when you're awake
@Vocaloid I'm back
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vocaloid just start off with the a terms use rule 1 + 2 to simplify (a^2 * a^3)/(a^5) \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\) have you made any progress on this?
well this simplified would be a^5
the numerator becomes a^5 so (a^5)/(a^5) = ?
1
good, now we move on to the b terms b * b^2 = ?
b^3
good, now we move on to the c terms c/(c^2 * c^4) = ?
1/c^5
good so putting everything together --> b^3/c^5 --> your answer
thank you
\[\log (\frac{ (x+y)^3(x-y)^2 }{ x^2+y^2 })\]
is this the right answer for this
yup good
it's basically just the reverse of what you just did, separate the components of the log then drop the exponent down as coefficients
2log(x+3)... then continue with the rest of the log
the website is trying to expand the logarithm all the way even though it's probably not needed 2log(x+3) - log(x-2) - 4log(x^2+5) is what they are looking for
rewrite as an exponential equation \[\ln (x+y)=5\]
raise both sides to the power of e
e^5=x+y
good but you might want to re-write that as y = e^5 - x so it looks like an equation of y in terms of x
rewrite as an logarithmic equation 2^4=(a-b)
|dw:1517497396050:dw|
y = (a - b), b is the base 2 and x is the exponent 4 re-write in the log form
log2(a-b)=4
good
I'm sorry not this one
a. 5 b. -4 c. -3 d. 0
well done
I dont know how to solve this for t
divide both sides by 500 first then take the natural log of each side then dividing by 0.06 will isolate t
4.709
check your calculations again let's just take it one step at a time, divide both sides by 500 and lmk what you get
5=e^0.06t
good, now take the natural log of each side
wait is it 26....?
good but it wants 3 decimal places so your answer would be...?
26.824
good, that's it
since ln(0) is undefined which two choices can you eliminate right off the bat?
um c
what value of x will make ln(x-5) = ln(0)?
oh a and b
good, a and b are out the actual behavior of ln(x-5) show that it increases quickly before crossing (6,0) so D is the best choice
for 13 if we plug in x = 0 we get 6, making A and B possible candidates since the exponent is -x it will keep decreasing as x ---> infinity so B
=)
14 - what is the common ratio?
x3
good (just 3) so r = 3 a1 = first term = 2 use nth term = a1 * r ^ (n-1) to find the nth term
2 * 3 ^ (n-1)
good try to remember what n stands for
21
good, n = 12 so evaluate 2 * 3 ^ (n-1)
69735
you left off some digits, it's a very big #
6973568802
good
for 15 figure out the common ratio by dividing a3/a2
0.7
good, now we need to figure out what a1 is if a1 * r = a2 then what is a1?
a1 * r = 0.7
would r be 6?
we calculated r earlier
0.7
a1 * 0.7= 0.7 a1=1
awesome now you have everything you need|dw:1517499714775:dw| evaluate sum
so sn=1(1-0.7^n/1-0.7)
yes, keep going
remember what n stands for also don't enter sn into the formula, it will treat sn as s*n
just enter this part 1(1-0.7^n/1-0.7) and replace n w/ the appropriate value
n is 0.7?
n is the number of terms r is 0.7.
6?
good, now evaluate the expression
0.74
check your calculations again, the answer is much bigger than that
(1-0.7^6)/(1-0.7) = ?
2.94
good but let's try to leave as many digits as possible so 2.94117
okay rewrite using radicals\[(a^\frac{ 3 }{ 4 })^5\]
i got\[(4 \sqrt{a^3})^5\]
yeah, that's right (just make sure the 4 is sitting on the radical sign not out in front) also I"m not sure if they'd want you to multiply that 5 through the exponent but let's go with your answer
rewrite using radical exponents\[\sqrt[5]{x^2}\]
basically it's the reverse of the earlier problem, the exponent becomes the numerator of the fraction-exponent and the radical becomes the denominator
\[x^\frac{ 2 }{ 5 }\]
good
If you deposit $1,000 into an account that pays 4% interest compounded continuously, how long will it take the account to grow to $2,000?
A = Pe^rt solve for t
A = Pe^rt we are given A, P and r: 2000 = 1000e^0.04t divide both sides by 1000: 2 = e^0.04t take Napierian log of both sides: ln2 = 0.04t divide both sides by 0.04: t = ln2/0.04 ~ 17.33 years or 17years 4 months
is this right
yeah that's good
we want to know when Q(t) = 0.10Q_0 so plug in 0.10Q_0 for Q(t) and solve for t, you're given everything else and Q_0 should cancel out on both sides
0.1
check your calculations again, it should be much bigger than that 0.10Q_0 = Q_0 * e^(-0.07t) solve for t
0.10= * e^(-0.07t)
um what would e be?
e is euler's number and always has this value |dw:1517501608878:dw|
the software you are using should have e automatically programmed into it, look for an italicized e
32.89
this gives me 38 seconds (since they want it rounded up to the nearest second)
yeah its probably my mistake in calculations
for 21 they're probably looking for "exponential" 22 - "limited" 23 - probably 'carrying capacity"
Thank you so much
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!