how are these symmetric matrices.. I am confuse how they explained it
@Nnesha
let's take the 2x2 matrix first|dw:1518065659313:dw|
to start the transpose: the first row becomes the first column of the transpose, so:|dw:1518065695118:dw|
then the second row becomes the second column, like so:|dw:1518065742122:dw|
producing two equal matrices does this make sense?
oh okay that makes sense but where it says symmetric matrix ... the main diagnal has to be all 0's?
oh there are two types, just plain "symmetric" and "skew-symmetric" for just plain symmetric the transpose is equal to itself for skew-symmetric the transpose is equal to the negative of itself, and in this case only the diagonals must all be 0's
oh, was that a symmetric example that you posted?
yeah the example I posted was symmetric
the reasoning for the 0-diagonals: aij and aji are corresponding terms on skew-symmetric matrices (the term in row i and column j ---> turns into ---> the term in row j and column i of the transpose) for a skew-symmetric matrices, aij = -aji (by definition) on the diagonals, i = j so aii = -aii
(and that's only true for aii = 0)
oh okay
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!