Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
xXMarcelieXx:

how are these symmetric matrices.. I am confuse how they explained it

xXMarcelieXx:

1 attachment
xXMarcelieXx:

@Nnesha

Vocaloid:

let's take the 2x2 matrix first|dw:1518065659313:dw|

Vocaloid:

to start the transpose: the first row becomes the first column of the transpose, so:|dw:1518065695118:dw|

Vocaloid:

then the second row becomes the second column, like so:|dw:1518065742122:dw|

Vocaloid:

producing two equal matrices does this make sense?

xXMarcelieXx:

oh okay that makes sense but where it says symmetric matrix ... the main diagnal has to be all 0's?

Vocaloid:

oh there are two types, just plain "symmetric" and "skew-symmetric" for just plain symmetric the transpose is equal to itself for skew-symmetric the transpose is equal to the negative of itself, and in this case only the diagonals must all be 0's

xXMarcelieXx:

oh, was that a symmetric example that you posted?

Vocaloid:

yeah the example I posted was symmetric

Vocaloid:

the reasoning for the 0-diagonals: aij and aji are corresponding terms on skew-symmetric matrices (the term in row i and column j ---> turns into ---> the term in row j and column i of the transpose) for a skew-symmetric matrices, aij = -aji (by definition) on the diagonals, i = j so aii = -aii

Vocaloid:

(and that's only true for aii = 0)

xXMarcelieXx:

oh okay

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!