Write the expression in standard form.
\[(x+2)^2\]
I know the next step is \[(x+2)(x+2)\]
In order to answer this, you would have to know the standard form of a quadratic expression in advance.
I know the quadratic formula.
Said nothing about quadratic formula. Not needed to solve this.
Don't you do the Foil Method?
Nope.
FOIL is not needed for this.
You said “quadratic” made me think is that..
Oh
@Flamo think distributive property for this.
If you have \((x + 3)(x + 7)\) let \(a = (x + 3), b = x \text{ and } c = 7\)
So.. a=\[x+2\]b=\[x\] and c=\[2\]
Then \(a(b + c) = (x + 3)(x + 7) = x(x + 3) + 7(x + 3) = ab + ac = x^2 + 3x + 7x + 21\)
\(= x^2 + 10x + 21\) No FOIL needed
Is this reverse factoring?
Yes @EndersWorld
Yes @EndersWorld
Next problem IS factoring and I ai t feeling good about it.
Not to worry. We will get through it together.
Oh, I see
\[x(x+2)+2(x+2)\]
\[x^2+2x+2x+4\]
Beautiful work so far.
\[x^2+4x+4\]
Bingo
Next is factoring... the bane of my existence...
Never liked FOIL anyways. I always knew there was something wrong with the method. I like more automated processes rather than mnemonic techniques. mnemonic techniques like FOIL are not purely mathematical. That's my issue with it. It's a memory technique not a mathematical formula.
My memory is shot anyway.
That comment was more aimed @Flamo
Oh
Wanted his/her response on it.
I'm a he
Okay, so what are your thoughts on it? If it were up to me, FOIL would be banned in all countries worldwide
I used FOIL Before, Although I don't remember the other way to not using FOIL and still getting the correct answer.
But why would you want to ban FOIL?
Distributive Property is the only real mathematical method to use to multiply two binomials. It's either that or Stack Multiplication: |dw:1525210309860:dw|
Oh wow, That is much easier to me now that I see it.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!