Solve and write solution intervals
\[\frac{ x^3 - 2x^2 - 3x }{ x + 1 } \ge 0\]
Okay, so basically for this, you can do polynomial division.
You know how to do that right?
let me check and see if I remember
|dw:1526884771672:dw|
sorry it puts them a bit weird
So what is the resultant polynomial expression?
x^2 -3x ?
Yes, write it as \(x(x - 3)\ge0\)
hm ok
So basically, at this point you can either graph that on paper or you can make intervals based on critical points. Do you know the critical points?
It's much easier to just graph on paper btw. We know the quadratic expression is concave up because the leading term is positive.
I think my teacher wants me to use interval notation
You'll get the interval solution no matter which method you use.
Yeah but in class we did like the union shape
|dw:1526885475666:dw|
That's after you actually find the intervals. We have to find the intervals first.
oh
how do we do that
Do you not know know how to graph the expression on paper? If you can't graph it then the next step is to make a number line and plot the critical points.
I think we did it using the number line
Okay, so what are the critical points?
I am not sure
The critical points are the all the values of \(x\) that will make the expression on the left side equal zero.
0 and 3?
Correct. Now make your number line using the drawing pad
Highlight the critical points
|dw:1526885941255:dw|
So basically what you have just done is create three intervals: \((-\infty, 0], [0,3], [3, \infty)\) |dw:1526886113141:dw| We have to figure out which of those intervals will be greater than or equal to zero.
I think I just remembered how to do this. I got (- infinity,0] and [3,infinity) as solutions
If we find a value along an interval that produces a result that is greater than zero, then we put a PLUS above it. If we find a value along the interval that produces a result that is less than zero then we put a MINUS above it.
That is correct.
hmm, was there any tricks to this one like the numerator/denominator thing a couple problems ago?
That wasn't a trick. That's just what I do anytime I see a rational expression.
What they teach in school about how to do these is silly.
Wait, what numerator/denominator thing? I thought you were talking about this problem at first.
Where if the numerator degree is larger than the denominator degree, there is no horizontal asymptote. Teachers like those things on tests so I was just wondering if there was anything like that on this one.
What I just showed you IS the trick. Trust me.
I don't know how your teacher showed you how to do these though. I mean you could try factoring, but eventually, she will give you one that won't factor so easily. Then you'll be stuck. The method I showed you works for just about any problem your teacher will give you on these if it involves a rational expression.
That's why I showed it to you. We could have just factored and got the same expression
oh wow you're right, just tried it
Go ahead and post your next one.
sorry I lost connection
Yeah, Server related crashes. Go ahead and post your next question.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!