\[\frac{dy}{dx}-\frac{2y}{x}=\frac{3y^4}{x^2}\]
this is where we are, right?
๐
ok now if the y part was not on the right, this would be one like from 2.3, linear
So whats the difference between bernoulli and linear?
\[\huge \frac{dy}{dx}-\frac{2y}{x}=\frac{3\color{red}{y^4}}{x^2}\]
you gotta get rid of that \(y^4\) to make it linear. It is bernoulli because that \(y^4\) is there
Does y have to be on both sides as well to make it a bernoulli? Or can it be x = y^4?
\[y'+p(x)y=f(x)\] is linear \[y'+p(x)y=f(x)y^n\]is bernoulli
Oh! So linear doesnt have any y on the right side?
no it does not
2.3 had definition
That makes so much more sense.
This textbook sucks. I actually miss stewarts now lol
so gimmick is to make bernoulli linear by making a substitution
you make the magic substitution \ and by some miracle it goes
u = y/x ?
\[\huge u=y^{1-n}\]
Oops
that was for the other type
Ok
homo genius
so i guess you missed why the magic trick works right?
Yes
ok we can see what happens by doing it in this example, although 15 was easier (kinda)
Okie
\[\huge \frac{dy}{dx}-\frac{2y}{x}=\frac{3\color{red}{y^4}}{x^2}\]evidently \(n=4\) so substitution is ...
\(n=4\)so substitution is ?
Y^-3
yeah \(u=y^{-3}\) first step is to solve that for \(y\) and then calculate \(\frac{dy}{du}\)
How?
are you asking me how to solve \(u=y^{-3}\) for \(y\)??
No I thought to solve for yโ itโs the chain rule
no, first solve for y, then compute \(\frac{dy}{du}\) will make your life much easier before we do any subsitution
Ok
well...
Idk
jeez i have to do everything \[u=y^{-3}\\ \huge u^{-\frac{1}{3}}=y\]
I thought so. I just forgot my minus sign
now what is \(\frac{dy}{du}\) ?
U^(-1/3)
no, that is just y
take the derivative yo
0?
better yet, call me, this is taking more time than it is worth
\
\
\(y=u^{-\frac{1}{3}}\) \(\frac{dy}{du}=-\frac{1}{3}u^{-\frac{1}{3}-1}\)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!