Ask your own question, for FREE!
Chemistry 12 Online
zarkam21:

3.97 x 10^-7 ?

zarkam21:

Vocaloid:

it wants the answer in nanometers yours is currently in meters, so simply multiply by 10^9

zarkam21:

How do you find the principal level

zarkam21:

Vocaloid:

ah so you are given ni = 6 and the wavelength you'd use the rydberg equation 1/lambda = R(1/nf^2 - 1/ni^2) to find nf

Vocaloid:

make sure to convert 98.3nm to meters first since the rydberg constant is in meters

zarkam21:

1/(9.83x10^10) = (1.097x10^7)(1/nf^2 - 1/36)

Vocaloid:

wait

zarkam21:

okay

Vocaloid:

should be -10 on that exponent 1/(9.83x10^-10) = (1.097x10^7)(1/nf^2 - 1/36)

zarkam21:

I dont know why Im not getting a -10 ... oh well

Vocaloid:

ah should be -8

Vocaloid:

93.8nm --> divide by 10^9 --> 93.8e-8 whoops

Vocaloid:

but anyway 1/(9.83x10^-8) = (1.097x10^7)(1/nf^2 - 1/36) should give you your nf value

zarkam21:

I thought it was

1 attachment
zarkam21:

I thought it would be divived by 10^-9

Vocaloid:

ah, not quite, putting a negative exponent in the denominator --> end up with a positive exponent

Vocaloid:

if it helps to think of it this way, 93.8 nm is only a very small portion of a meter so we would expect the result to be very small thus we would want to divide by 10^9 not 10^(-9)

Vocaloid:

|dw:1538005835592:dw|

zarkam21:

but what about the nano part,,, isnt nano 10^-9

Vocaloid:

10^(-9) would be converting m to nm we want the other way around this time

zarkam21:

oh okay I see. Since it is like the inverse the signs would change

Vocaloid:

like, there's two ways to write the conversion factor 1 m = 10^9nm or 1 nm = 10^(-9) m so both of these conversion factors would work you just gotta be careful about how to use them

Vocaloid:

1 m = 10^9nm gives us 98.3nm/10^9 or 1 nm = 10^(-9) m gives us 98.3nm*10^(-9) both give the same result using different conversion factors

Vocaloid:

1/(9.83x10^-8) = (1.097x10^7)(1/nf^2 - 1/36) should give you your nf value anyway chucking this into a calculator gives 1 as your nf value, so n = 1 is the principal energy value and thus your sol'n

zarkam21:

Okay, so I got 3.31 x 10^-10

zarkam21:

zarkam21:

for this one

Vocaloid:

I’m on my phone so I can’t really check this easily But it wants it as a percentage of the speed of light So you’d solve for v in the de brogue equation then do v/c * 100

zarkam21:

so v is 2.20x10^6 its a given... so (2.20x10^6)/(2.998x10^8) * 100

zarkam21:

i got 7.34 x 10^15

Vocaloid:

Hm that doesn’t sound right Anyway i need to workout but I asked someone to take over for me >>

zarkam21:

OKay =)

SmokeyBrown:

Hi zarkam, I'm trusting you're using the correct numbers here. If that's true, then I think you should get around 0.734 % as your answer.

SmokeyBrown:

To see why this is true, consider that (10^6)/(10^8)*100 simplifies to 1. 10^6 * 100 = 10^8; 10^8/10^8 = 1 So, the only relevant calculation you have to do is 2.20/2.998. As you can see for yourself, that equals about 0.734

zarkam21:

where is the 2.20 coming from

SmokeyBrown:

Haha, that's the number you gave my dude. But if we want to calculate the velocity of the particle from the information given, we can use the equation: \[\lambda=\frac{ h }{ p }\] where lambda stands for the de broglie wavelength of the particle, h stands for planck's constant, and p stands for the momentum of the particle (recall that momentum is equal to mass multiplied by velocity)

zarkam21:

Could you explain what I did wrong here?

zarkam21:

SmokeyBrown:

Hm, did you remember to convert the mass to kilograms when calculating momentum?

zarkam21:

Nvm got it lol sorry

SmokeyBrown:

Ok, awesome

zarkam21:

@SmokeyBrown I have a question> : What is the de Broglie equation used for?

zarkam21:

like to find what?

SmokeyBrown:

So, the de Broglie equation describes the relationship between a particle's wavelength and its momentum (using Planck's constant) Basically, if you have the wavelength, you can find the momentum, and if you have the momentum, you can find the wavelength. Since momentum can be broken down into mass and velocity, you can also calculate these values, provided you have the other values required in the equation.

zarkam21:

SO h wouldbe plancks.. v would be (velocity /speed) I'm confused with what m would be

zarkam21:

I know it would be mass but in a problem like : Calculate the wavelength of an electron traveling with a speed of 3.21 × 105 m/s..... I don't know what the mass would be

SmokeyBrown:

Oh, for that question you'd just have to know that all electrons have approximately the same mass. According to Google, this value is 9.10938356 × 10^-31 kilograms

zarkam21:

OKay so 2.27 x 10^-9?

zarkam21:

?

SmokeyBrown:

uhhhhhhh yes

SmokeyBrown:

Sorry, it took a while for me to plug that into my calculator

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!