velocity of a neutron with 100pm wavelength
@Vocaloid
|dw:1538100238096:dw|
make sure to convert pm to m first
but what would the mass be?
mass of a neutron in kg
okay so i woud first rearrange the equation to v=h/(m)(lambda)
yes
is the rearragement good
yes
3.956x10^-21
as your final solution? hm, no, a neutron would move much faster than that 100pm * (10^(-12) will convert pm to meters so 100 * 10^(-12) = (6.626e-34)/(v * 1.674927351e-27) solve for v
3656
hm, I got something slightly different chucking it into a calculator gives me 3955.99 m/s (they only gave you 1 sig fig so round up to 4000?)
Yeah I would believe so
lightbulb can produce 9.8x10^20 photons in one second with a wavelength of 434nm. Hoe much energy in joules will this light build produce in one hour
okay so first is to convert nm to m and I got 10x10^-18
and the formula would be E=hv=hc/lambda
hm. not 100% sure but here are my thoughts: E = hc/lambda plugging in planck's constant, wavelength, speed of light to get E for one photon then multiply by the number of photons 9.8x10^20 photons to get joules then, since that's energy per second, multiply by 3600 to get energy per hour since 1 hour = 3600 seconds
wave length would be 10x10^-18
hm not quite 1 nm = 10*(-9) m so 434 nm = 434 * 10^(-9) m
1.615x10^-8 energy/second
hm, not quite, you may have inverted something anyway E = hc/lambda = 6.626e-34*3e8/(434*10^(-9)) multiplying by the number of photons, then multiplying by 3600 6.626e-34*3e8/(434*10^(-9)) * 3600 * 9.8x10^20
for some reason I'm getting 0 x 10^20
hm. might be an exponent issue w/ whatever program you're using anyway I end up with 1.6e6
Joules
yes
spectral lines in the Balmer series, emission back down to the n=2 level, for the hydrogen atom occur at 656.3nm, 486.1nm, 434.0nm, and 410.2nm. What is the wavelength for the next line in this series
hm. i'd have to think about this one for a bit. you'd probably use the rydberg equation where nf is 2 at least.
this would be the En=rhc/n^2?
hm, close but not quite. we are dealing with wavelengths not energies so 1/lambda = R(1/nf^2 - 1/ni^2) anyway I got what they were going for. if you let nf = 2, and plug in ni = 3,4,5, and 6, you end up with the wavelengths they give you so the next one must be ni = 7 1/lambda = (1.097e-7)(1/2^2 - 1/7^2) solve for lambda
3.x10^-9
3.9x10^-9
hm, I got something a bit different, (397nm) i'm using wolframalpha for my calculations
do i vhange it to m
there's an unspoken rule in math that you should give back whatever units they give you so since they give you nm in the original equation stick with nm
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!