Ask your own question, for FREE!
Chemistry 7 Online
zarkam21:

stumped

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

@Vocaloid

Vocaloid:

1. there's only two choices (C and O) the less electronegative atom goes in the center and the more EN atoms go on the outer edges so would C be the first blank or O?

zarkam21:

c would be the first

zarkam21:

for the second blank:

Vocaloid:

good, so carbon first blank and oxygen second blank

Vocaloid:

2. ideas about the bond type? it would either have to be covalent or ionic

zarkam21:

covalent

Vocaloid:

*looks at answer choices* oh wait that's not one of the choices whoops I guess they're looking for either single or double. any attempts to draw the lewis structure?

zarkam21:

it would be double bonded

Vocaloid:

good, so double

zarkam21:

c in the middle with 2 o's with double bonds

zarkam21:

linear for the next geometry

Vocaloid:

3. ideas for the geometry? 2 bonds, 0 lone pairs

Vocaloid:

good

Vocaloid:

4. hybridization, any ideas? if you are stumped try calculating the steric #

zarkam21:

sp3

Vocaloid:

hm, not quite, steric number is 2 (C is bonded to 2 other atoms, plus 0 lone pairs) so sp

zarkam21:

how do you determin the steric NUm again?

Vocaloid:

|dw:1540949586801:dw|

Vocaloid:

i'd have to think a bit about 5 but the pi orbitals should result from the overlap of p orbitals

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

yeah well pi bonds are always p

Vocaloid:

yeah that should be it

zarkam21:

What is the hybridization of the central iodine atom in I3−?

zarkam21:

sp3d

Vocaloid:

good that's what i got too

zarkam21:

it says : Express your answer in the orbital notations s, p, d, and f.

zarkam21:

so that would still be right

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

this can be tedious but you'd start with compound 1 (1 valence electron), put 1 electron in to the MO diagram. --> that one ends up unpaired so this is paramagnetic then you'd continue this process w/ the other compounds

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

need to re-do some of them for example, 6 is paramagnetic. you'd fill up the first 4 electrons but then the last 2 are unpaired b/c they occupy separate orbitals

Vocaloid:

as a hint: any odd number will be paramagnetic (if there are an odd number it's impossible for them all to be paired) for even numbers you have to consider on a case-by-case basis

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

8 should be diamagnetic (they all get paired up w/in the first four orbitals) but everything else is good

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

6 should be paramagnetic per our earlier reasoning (unpaired electrons in 2pi bonding) diamagnetic should contain: 2, 4, 8, 10, 14, 16; everything else is para

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

hm. :/

Vocaloid:

oh I see they wanted a different orbital diagram than the one they used before

zarkam21:

yeah and thats what I based my previous answer off of

zarkam21:

This

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

then yeah, your orig. should have been right

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

that's a good attempt but F2- fills up all of the anti-bonding orbitals and anti-bonding orbitals are not desired for stability. I'd put F2- at the bottom F2+ keeps the antibonding orbitals empty so it's the most stable F2 goes in between so basically just reverse the order you have already

Vocaloid:

anything with a * symbol (sigma*, pi*) etc. are antibonding orbitals

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

|dw:1540952522320:dw| not 100% sure on this but thinking the lithium might be diamagnetic

Vocaloid:

|dw:1540952536946:dw|

zarkam21:

okay so lithium and carbon would be dia

Vocaloid:

I don't really feel super confident on these tbh

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

if I"m not mistaken B2(2+) has 8 total electrons, occupying the first four orbitals, therefore being dia

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

oh since each C has 6 electrons -- 12 electrons --> +2 because it's an anion --> 14 total electrons --> fills up the first 7 orbitals to be diamagnetic so if moving C2(2-) doesn't work idk where to go from there

zarkam21:

so all three dia

Vocaloid:

no, B2(2+ is still para

zarkam21:

ugh now its 3 out of 3 incorrect

zarkam21:

1 attachment
Vocaloid:

oh in that case that makes it super easy, just switch all the para's to dia's and all the dia's to paras

Vocaloid:

ohhh I see where I went wrong, there's a -1 charge on the carbon not a -2 charge >_>

zarkam21:

got it ughh thankssss

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!