Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 10 Online
zarkam21:

limits?

Vocaloid:

do you have any specific questions?

zarkam21:

Maybe just a defintion first :S

zarkam21:

I actually can make a "cheat sheet" and put whatever I want on the sheet

zarkam21:

And my professor gave us a list of topics and the first is limits so I know I should put examples on there

zarkam21:

but like idk where to start :S

zarkam21:

:/

Vocaloid:

"the value that a function approaches as the domain approaches a certain value"?

Vocaloid:

if your prof. uses delta/epsilon definitions, include those as well

zarkam21:

no he doesn't use those

zarkam21:

its calc IA so

Vocaloid:

|dw:1541119790020:dw| alright what else do you want to know?

zarkam21:

maybe some examples of problems with limits :S

zarkam21:

Ugh I'm not sure

Vocaloid:

https://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~kouba/ProblemsList.html try the first two links "limit of a function as x approaches a constant" and "limit of a function as x approaches infinity"

Vocaloid:

but the general approach: first you try plugging in x, if you get something undefined from that, try other techniques like l'hopital's or re-writing the function

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

SO for this i got the 0 over o part but Idk what is going on after could you just explain it to me

Vocaloid:

since 0/0 is undefined they factored the numerator and denominator, cancelled out then they cancelled out the (x-2) from the numerator and denominator after that, you can now plug in x = 2 and get something defined

Vocaloid:

special note: 0/0 is called indeterminate form

zarkam21:

oh so basically just take the dactored form and subsitute in that

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

Gonna just do a few more practice problems and then I'll be back in like 5 mins

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

Don't get how this wouldn't be zero

Vocaloid:

infinity's not really a number so "infinity minus infinity" isn't really 0 in this case the higher exponent, at very very high values, makes the lower exponent kind of irrelevant, so the function will just keep increasing at x ---> infinity

zarkam21:

Next topic product rule =)

Vocaloid:

for derivatives?

zarkam21:

Yes

Vocaloid:

|dw:1541122317347:dw|

Vocaloid:

if you have a specific example we can work through it together i gues

Vocaloid:

would def. recommend memorizing this or writing it down on your cheat sheet

zarkam21:

Yeh, I just wrote it

zarkam21:

OKay I have handouts he gave so I can just show that and we can work through that and I will just write them as "practice problems" on the cheat sheet?

zarkam21:

Do you think that woul dbe good

zarkam21:

or should I do something else to practice product rule

Vocaloid:

idk if you should put them on the cheat sheet (that takes up valuable space) but working through them would be good

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

I have the handouts all mixed up but this would be on where i would use product rule right

Vocaloid:

yes

Vocaloid:

a) is asking for the derivative of the sum, not the product but for the rest, you should use the product rule

zarkam21:

sorry trying to take notes as I go

zarkam21:

the derivate of x^2 is 2x right

zarkam21:

and the derivative of g(x) is um 3/2+1

Vocaloid:

g(x) = (1+x)^(3/2) bring the exponent down --> (3/2) reduce the original exponent by 1 ---> (1+x)^(1/2) take the derivative of the base ---> derivative of 1 + x is just 1 so g'(x) = (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) * 1

zarkam21:

okay for the sum I just do( (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) * 1) + (2x)

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

do i actually solve or leave as is

Vocaloid:

there's nothing to solve for, it's asking for the derivative so that's it

zarkam21:

okay b would be ((2x) * (1+x)^3/2) + (3/2(1+x)^1/2*1)*x^2

Vocaloid:

yeah idk how picky they are with simplifying, but that's mathematically correct

zarkam21:

im not sure how to do c

Vocaloid:

it's the same logic as c, but instead of g(x) you just use f(x) again so derivative of f(x)*f(x) = f'(x)*f(x) + f(x)*f'(x)

Vocaloid:

remember that f and g are just arbitrary labels for the two component functions

zarkam21:

2x*x^2 + x^2 * 2x

Vocaloid:

good in this case, the algebraic simplification is very easy so they would probably expect you to simplify this down to 4x^3

zarkam21:

okay so for D it woul just be (3/2(1+x)^1/2*1 * (1+x)^3/2) + (1+x)^3/2) * (3/2(1+x)^1/2*1

Vocaloid:

yes since both terms are like terms you can add them to get 3(1+x)^1/2 * (1+x)^3/2) = 3(x+1)^2

Vocaloid:

if you're in a rush just try to get the derivative part right, and only simplify if you have time

zarkam21:

Yeah thats what Im gonna do like at the end if I have time ill simplify

zarkam21:

okay so for e : it woul djust be (f' * g )+(g'*f)(f' * g )+(g'*f)

zarkam21:

?

Vocaloid:

good attempt but you need to treat "f(x) + g(x)" as one whole unit derivative of [(f(x) + g(x)) * (f(x) + g(x))] ---> [ f(x) + g(x) ]' * [f(x) + g(x)] + [ f(x) + g(x) ] * [ f(x) + g(x) ]'

zarkam21:

I'm not sure where i would use prime and where not :S

Vocaloid:

just fill in [ f(x) + g(x) ]' with your solution from part a) since you've already done that

zarkam21:

oh okay

zarkam21:

( (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) * 1) + (2x) * ( (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) * 1) + (2x)

Vocaloid:

gonna use different variables to make this more clear d/dx of a(x) * b(x) --> a'(x)b(x) + a(x)b'(x) replace a(x) with "f(x) + g(x)" replace b(x) with "f(x) + g(x)" d/dx of [f(x) + g(x)] * [f(x) + g(x)] --> [f(x) + g(x) ]'[f(x) + g(x)] + [ f(x) + g(x) ]'[f(x) + g(x)]

Vocaloid:

uh

zarkam21:

it would just be the answer from part a being multiplies by each othr rigt

zarkam21:

because part a is asking for f(x)+g(x)

Vocaloid:

no it's a little more complicated than that

Vocaloid:

so we know that f(x) + g(x) = x^2 + (1+x)^(3/2) and [f(x) + g(x)]' = 2x + (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) so plugging both of these into the product rule: [f(x) + g(x) ]'[f(x) + g(x)] + [ f(x) + g(x) ]'[f(x) + g(x)] ---> [x^2 + (1+x)^(3/2)]*[ 2x + (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) ] + [ 2x + (3/2)(1+x)^(1/2) ] * [x^2 + (1+x)^(3/2)]

zarkam21:

oh okay so we don't only take the answer from part one but combine them to get it

zarkam21:

I see

zarkam21:

do you think there will be problems with the product rule with actual numbers?

zarkam21:

wait Water these are numbers

zarkam21:

wth*

zarkam21:

Sorry my brain is fried

zarkam21:

okay i think I got the product rukle down

Vocaloid:

have you learned quotient rule yet? that's another good one to add

zarkam21:

That was gonna be next =)

Vocaloid:

|dw:1541125431921:dw| the lo d hi stuff is a mnemonic device, just write down the top part

zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

1 attachment
zarkam21:

which one is the qr one

Vocaloid:

the one where you're asked to take the derivative of a quotient (f(x)/g(x)) or something similar

Vocaloid:

just be aware you can't just take the derivative of the numerator/derivative of the denominator and call it a day, it follows a very specific format (see above)

zarkam21:

ut would it be similar. I would start by just taking the individuals derivatives of f(x), g(x), and h(x) right

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

the derivative of 1/x = 1/(x^2) :S ??

Vocaloid:

almost, -1/x^2

Vocaloid:

1/x = x^(-1) bring the exponent down --> -1 reduce the exponent by 1 --> x^(-2) so -1/x^2

zarkam21:

and then 2x e ?

zarkam21:

then we would do for a (2x/(-1/x^2))

Vocaloid:

again, you cannot just take derivative of numerator/derivative of denominator|dw:1541126393673:dw|

Vocaloid:

derivative of f(x) = 2x derivative of g(x) = (-1/x^2) so derivative of f(x)/g(x) ---> [ (1/x)*2x - x^2*(-1/x^2) ] / (1/x)^2

Vocaloid:

|dw:1541126523002:dw|

zarkam21:

Oh I see

zarkam21:

Basically just go by the formual and don't worry about whay they gvie

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

|dw:1541126920773:dw|

zarkam21:

Isn't this number supposed to be 2x because f' is 2x

Vocaloid:

in your specific situation, yes

zarkam21:

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Vocaloid derivative of f(x) = 2x derivative of g(x) = (-1/x^2) so derivative of f(x)/g(x) ---> [ (1/x)*2x - x^2*(-1/x^2) ] / (1/x)^2 \(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)

Vocaloid:

wait a sec

Vocaloid:

oh wow that graphic actually has a typo

Vocaloid:

|dw:1541127066769:dw|

zarkam21:

f(x)/g(x) ---> [ (1/x)*2x - 2x*(-1/x^2) ] / (1/x)^2

zarkam21:

Lol what

Vocaloid:

the numerator should be g(x) * f'(x) - f(x) * g'(x) not g(x) * f'(x) - f'(x) * g(x)

zarkam21:

so (1/x)*(2x) - (x^2)*(-1/x^2) / (1/x)^2

Vocaloid:

yes just be careful with parentheses [(1/x)*(2x) - (x^2)*(-1/x^2)] / (1/x)^2

zarkam21:

okay so for b same thing right

zarkam21:

jusgt swtich the letters

zarkam21:

the values I mean

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

so would it be f(x)g'(x) - g(x)f'(x) / (f(x))^2

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

okaay and what about if we were to use f(x)/h (x)

zarkam21:

h would just take the place of g?

Vocaloid:

yes

zarkam21:

Okay I think we can move on , do you think this is all I needed to know for quotient rule?

Vocaloid:

yes, just know what the rule is and how to use it

zarkam21:

Okay should we up a new post ? or is this good

Vocaloid:

new post would be good

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!