In his essay on pp. 340–60, Clive Thompson reaches a different conclusion than Carr does, saying that “At their best, today’s digital tools help us see more, retain more, communicate more. At their worst, they leave us prey to the manipulation of the toolmakers. But on balance . . . what is happening is deeply positive.” Write a paragraph or two discussing how Carr might respond. What would he agree with, and what would he disagree with? In paragraphs 33–35, Thompson cites Nicholas Carr, whose views about tech-nology differ from his. How does he respond to Carr—and how does acknowledging views he disagrees with help support his own position?
We are unable to do this without the context of the story (so basically the full story) Bit even with it, I am quite sure no one would write the full thing for you e.e
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!