so If I have a point (0,2) on the function f(x) where would that point be in the transformation f(2(x-2))?
I had this in a precalc test so I want to know if I did it correctly
Are you sure you need my help @darkknight? You seem to understand math fairly well already.
pretty sure
need assurance for pre-calc
I see. There's a way you can check this yourself. Here's what you can do. Graph an expression in desmos that includes the point of interest. Name it \(f(x)\). Then apply the rule \(f(2(x-2))\) to see where the point transforms to.
okay
That should give you some intuition as to how the transformation \(f(2(x - 2))\) works.
but if a I had a function that effects the graph vertically, like if I had -3f(2(x-2))+5, then I couldn't use desmos. What would I do then
also including like other points
I think 3,7 was one and 9,3 was another
Why do you assume you are unable to use desmos?
You could find the equation of the line including the two points, name that \(f(x)\) then apply the transformation.
because then I wouldn't know the individual points. Like I wouldn't know where 0,2) is then
Not following what you mean. You know the location of \((0,2)\). Its two units north of the origin.
what I mean is that when 0,2) is applied in the transformed version. It is a different point. different x and y coordinates. so I wouldn't know where the point 0,2 is then
So I don't think I can use desmos
wait a minute
so in -3f(2(x-2))+5, 0,2 turns to be 2,7?
because the point is shifted 2 to the right and 5 up?
That is obviously incorrect because the negative implies that at some point you flip the point over the x-axis.
okay thats good, because thats not what I did on the quiz, lol
so this is what I did on the quiz
what happened
well I'll restart
So for the point (0,2) I would plug in 0 for x. subtract by 2 then multiply because inside the parenthesis is where the x is effected. I would then take the 2 and multiply by -3, then add 5. I would do something similar for the other ones
I don't know if thats right though
like how would you transform (0,2) @hero
someone plz help
I got -4,-11 for 0,2
How did you end up with that? Explain.
its up there
I must have said something that confused you.
Or maybe that was one of your answer choices.
we have no answer choices
if you apply the transformations to the point 0,2 do you end up with -4,-11?
Well, I have a method for doing these. It's unconventional but it gets the correct result.
how do you do it?
I want to know
@Hero?
To avoid confusing yourself, you should just follow the way your book teaches it.
well my book literally doesn't teach this
it only talks about transformations of functions not about individual points
how do you do it? I won't be confused. As long as it doesn't involve calculus or something
brb
please post your method though
Sorry if you felt I abandoned you. I was trying to think of an easier way to explain it.
Which I have now.
okay
So we have the point \((0,2)\) and we have to move it by the transformation \(-3f(2(x - 2))+5)\)
Since we know that \((0,2)\) is on the graph of \(f(x)\) we can say \(f(0) = 2\)
This means that for our transformation we need to make \(2(x - 2)\) = 0
why equals 0?
When we do this we find that the \(x-\) coordinate of our transformed point is \(x = 2\)
I don't get why 2(x-2) =0 like why 0?
nvm I get it
go on
Now that we know the \(x\) value, we set up the transformation this way:
\(-3f(2(2-2))+5\)
And that simplifies to \(-3f(0) + 5\)
hold up
nvm
But since \(f(0) = 2\) we can write \(-3(2) + 5\)
Continue simplifying to get the y coordinate.
okay
well I definetly failed the quiz lol
So you now know the transformed point is \((2, -1)\)
I hope you at least understand how to do these now.
thanks
the hero
There's another method of this that is not easy to explain.
okay, I have to go
Maybe that other explanation is what confused you.
thanks though
what about the point 3,7?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!