Question

When you analyze a peer's story, you should:
keep your positive comments to yourself
tell them what works and ask questions about what doesn't work
not say anything negative about the story
all of the above

Answer 1

@MrMudd183

Answer 2

ok so when you peer review your writing with someone else, you should give them positive comments as well as help them better their writing. This means we can eliminate options A and D.
now, when you peer review, should you tell them where they did not do well, along with where they did do good, or should you just say it was great?

Answer 3

so C

Answer 4

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @GIFmaker8
so C
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
well, you should tell them where they did not do well..it's constructive criticism.

Answer 5

huh

Answer 6

oof.
ok so you said between B and C that you pick C.
but like,say for example i am reading an essay you wrote. I would give you feedback on the things you did wrong, but i would also highlight the things you did well on.
which option. B or C, says that exactly^?

Answer 7

okkkkkk

Answer 8

B

Answer 9

right

Answer 10

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @GIFmaker8
B
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
Whats the reason u chose answer option B?

Answer 11

bc it explains stuff

Answer 12

\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @GIFmaker8
right
\(\color{#0cbb34}{\text{End of Quote}}\)
from B and C, I'd agree with you, because we want to show them how to improve while also showing them where they did very well.

Answer 13

so b

Answer 14

I'd agree.
Does it make sense why B is the best answer here?