Question: Hypotheticaly if you went the frame rate of the universe (plank time), and turned that into " 1 plank time to 1 meter ", could you essentially teleport a meter ahead " instantly "?

5.39121e-44 seconds = 1 plank time

So I think the speed needed is: 5.39121e+44 meters per " second " (?)

Question

Question: Hypotheticaly if you went the frame rate of the universe (plank time), and turned that into " 1 plank time to 1 meter ", could you essentially teleport a meter ahead " instantly "?

5.39121e-44 seconds = 1 plank time

So I think the speed needed is: 5.39121e+44 meters per " second " (?)

sydney07 · Answer

Yes — if (hypothetically) you could travel 1 meter in 1 Planck time:

Your speed would be ≈ 1.85×10^43 m/s.

That’s ~ 6.18×10^34 × 𝑐

You'd effectively "teleport" 1 meter from any observable frame, though technically you moved there via velocity.

But to achieve this, you'd need to transcend known physics — which, to put it gently, is a bit of a problem.

ihy · Answer

@sydney07 wrote:

Yes — if (hypothetically) you could travel 1 meter in 1 Planck time: Your speed would be ≈ 1.85×10^43 m/s. That’s ~ 6.18×10^34 × 𝑐 You'd effectively "teleport" 1 meter from any observable frame, though technically you moved there via velocity. But to achieve this, you'd need to transcend known physics — which, to put it gently, is a bit of a problem.

Correct

sydney07 · Answer

@ihy wrote:

@sydney07 wrote:

Yes — if (hypothetically) you could travel 1 meter in 1 Planck time: Your speed would be ≈ 1.85×10^43 m/s. That’s ~ 6.18×10^34 × 𝑐 You'd effectively "teleport" 1 meter from any observable frame, though technically you moved there via velocity. But to achieve this, you'd need to transcend known physics — which, to put it gently, is a bit of a problem.

Correct

ik its correct

ARAAG · Answer

buenos noches

Twaylor · Answer

@sydney07 wrote:

Yes — if (hypothetically) you could travel 1 meter in 1 Planck time: Your speed would be ≈ 1.85×10^43 m/s. That’s ~ 6.18×10^34 × 𝑐 You'd effectively "teleport" 1 meter from any observable frame, though technically you moved there via velocity. But to achieve this, you'd need to transcend known physics — which, to put it gently, is a bit of a problem.

No AI tyvm

ihy · Answer

@twaylor wrote:

@sydney07 wrote:

Yes — if (hypothetically) you could travel 1 meter in 1 Planck time: Your speed would be ≈ 1.85×10^43 m/s. That’s ~ 6.18×10^34 × 𝑐 You'd effectively "teleport" 1 meter from any observable frame, though technically you moved there via velocity. But to achieve this, you'd need to transcend known physics — which, to put it gently, is a bit of a problem.

No AI tyvm

LOL

sydney07 · Answer

its not AI swear on everything i love, i neva lie

ihy · Answer

Maybe she's just good at math?

sydney07 · Answer

@ihy wrote:

Maybe she's just good at math?

I am

ihy · Answer

@sydney07 wrote:

@ihy wrote:

Maybe she's just good at math?

I am

Nicee

SophisticatedViper · Answer

thats definetly faster than the universal speed limit of 299 792 458 meters per second

sydney07 · Answer

exactly

SophisticatedViper · Answer

not to mention that would look like youre lagging in real time

SophisticatedViper · Answer

also did the math for meters per hour and its quite demonic:
6.66E46 meters per hour, or 6.66e43 km per hr.

Twaylor · Answer

@sophisticatedviper wrote:

not to mention that would look like youre lagging in real time

technically you would be.

SophisticatedViper · Answer

i can just imagine how funny that would be to people

SophisticatedViper · Answer

@twaylor wrote:

@sophisticatedviper wrote:

not to mention that would look like youre lagging in real time

technically you would be.

like someone you talk to notices you just keep teleporting...it would be really funny

sydney07 · Answer

@sophisticatedviper wrote:

@twaylor wrote:

@sophisticatedviper wrote:

not to mention that would look like youre lagging in real time

technically you would be.

like someone you talk to notices you just keep teleporting...it would be really funny

frrr